Outrageous survey about India by British NGO PDF Print E-mail
( 6 Votes )

Just last month, a shocking poll about India emerged from Great Britain. This poll conducted by an NGO called "Trust Law" made some of the most outrageous claims about India and then it used all the international media channels to defame and degrade India and Indian people.Such polls can also severely harm India and also worsen Indian social problems like Female Foeticide. This NGO Trust Law is rub by Thomson Reuters Foundation.

The poll focused primarily on 5 countries in the world. They are Congo, Pakistan, Indian, Somalia and Afganistan. One has to wonder, what criterion they used to select these 5 countries in the first place; when the size and demographies of these countries are so diverse that any comparison between them is utter nonsense. 4 out of 5 of these countries have Muslim or Hindu majority except Congo, which has 96% Christians.

If after dubiously shortlisting and filtering 5 countries for a poll, to find which of these countries is most dangerous for women, the NGO Trust Law conducted a "Perception Poll".

Now, what the hell is a "Perception Poll"?

According to this NGO Trust Law, they selected secretely 213 global experts on Gender Issues and asked their opinion about which country is most dangerous in the world. Based on perception of these 213 so called experts, the countries are ranked in terms of how evil they are (towards women).

Now, any such perception based poll is purely unscientific. Perception is not science. I can have a perception that 20% of British boys aged 8 or 10 father children. My perception is based on one news I saw in TV.  Is that perception correct? No. It is not.

In scientific terms perception is a single or double derivative of reality. Its like confusing acceleration with velocity of a vehicle. Similarly, countries which are in news due to their size, demography or being political hotbeds can get a lot of bad publicity in media. It is to be noted that its easy for media to sell bad news.

So, the "Perception Poll" finally ranked the countries according to how evil they are towards women. Afganistan is ranked as most dangerous place for women in the world. It was followed by Congo, Pakistan and India. The fifth place was bagged by Somalia.

And what about Saudi Arabia, Iran, Nigeria, Thailand and many other countries?

Now, let us get some more details about what this poll and its media transcript has to say about India.

The media transcript says, "there are an estimated 100 million women and children trafficked in Indian every year (for prostitution)".

Now, here is where the authors, the founders or donors of this NGO are smoking grass. 100 million means 10 crores.

India has a total population of 1200 million people, out of which about 550 million are women and girls. According to the NGO's claims in its website and in media, 100 million out of 550 million women and girls are trafficked in India every single year. That means, in last one decade, all the Indian women are trafficked (for prostitution) at least twice.

That also means, according to "perception poll" and study by this NGO "Trust Law" all Indian women are forced prostitutes, who were trafficked into prostitution at least 2 times in last decade only.

Had the NGO conducted such a poll about China and indulged in such propaganda, China would have called the British Ambassador for an explanation and would have asked for formal appology from Great Britain and a ban on this useless NGO. However, this is India and our Italy born chairperson of ruling Congress Government or her appointed puppet Prime Minister have no time to look into such issues as the Govt is mired in corruption scandals. May be, the British who came to participate in the scandalous commonwealth games realised this to be right time for a massive anti-Indian propaganda.

Now, coming back to the psychology of such NGOs, one has to rationally explore different motives.

The NGO Trust Law is funded by "Thomson Reuters Foundation". Its a pretty unknown entity and it started its "Women's Rights" initiative just recently. So, it needed some publicity. So, what is the best way to gain publicity in the most cost effective way? May be it should bash up some "soft state" or "some poor country" dependent on International donors. It can not bash up Saudi Arabia or Iran risking a 20% hike in global oil prices and triggering an international crisis. It can not bash Thailand as it does not want some British men having sex with teenage prostitutes there to be handcuffed and paraded in media.

Now, this story is propagated all over the world through thousands of new media channels and large number of Indian news channels and newspapers. So, now it is the job of Indians to sincerely believe that India and India's culture is one of the most dangerous in the world towards women. We must not look at statistics.

The previous lies propagated by Harvard, Lancet, Oprah and many other vested interests have resulted in the conviction on this perception. According to Oprah and Lisa Ling, Bangalore is "Bride Burning" capital. No one looks at the data on ground. According to Lancet propaganda, 106,000 women die due to burning every year in India. According to Time Magazine thr propaganda is, 25000 women are killed for dowry in Indian every year.

The reality is: Indian women are 2 times safer than American women in their homes or outside. The spousal homicide rates of women in India are exactly half that of United States of America. The domestic violence rates of many Indian States (for example, Karnataka) are less than even United States of America.

Yet, the Western World is obsessed with sweeping generalisations about India and continues to conduct fake surveys to keep the rumour mills running.

Somehow, the feminists running these countries believe "Alarmism and Radical fire-fighting will improve condition of women and children in non-western countries". They are absolutely righteous about this belief, "Alarmism works".

Even Trust Law employed some people to make claims that such alarmist degrading polls and surveys help highlight the issues. How do these white people assume from a distance of 6000 miles that they know all the solutions for problems in India? May be they think that they are racially superior.

India's GDP was more than entire treasury of Queen of England before British plundered India like thieves and decoits. India's GDP was second to Chinas just 400 years back.

If today, we make every young Indian man and women believe that India is one of the most dangerous places for women, then which parent would like to have a girl child? Every parent would like to have a boy and hence this alarmism only contributes an increase in female foeticide.

The feminists are now telling Indian people, "Kill the girl child" because India is dangerous for women.Then they use this gendercide data to claim, India is dangerous for girls and the vicious self-propelling engine worsens the social problems.

It does not matter even if 3 times more Indian men die compared to Indian women due to accidents, suicides or murders. Still, for these alarmist criminals, India is very safe for Men, but it is extremely unsafe for women.

Its time, Indian Foreign Ministry calls the British Ambassador and asks for an explanation for this evil propaganda and makes British Govt rein in this irresponsible NGO Trust Law.

Lies by British NGO Trust Law.

 
Why does the Indian Government formulate wrong laws? PDF Print E-mail
( 5 Votes )

Before going into the reasons as to why does the Indian Government do so, let us have a look as to what exactly do we mean by “Wrong Laws”? The following 2 criteria are very important to be considered while formulating any law:-

  1. Laws are meant to restrain citizens from committing crimes and harming other people without getting punished.
  2. Laws must apply equally to all citizens and discrimination of citizens in the eyes of law on any basis in not only unconstitutional but also inhuman in nature.

Any law that does not adhere to any of the above criteria, then it’s a Wrong Law. Also, specific to India, even the Constitution of India does not permit discrimination of citizens in the eyes of law on the basis of sex, caste or religion (Article 14). Yet, the Indian Governments, over the past several decades of India’s independence, have always conceptualized, formulated and implemented wrong laws, that are anti-male and gender biased in nature. And, still more being in pipeline, these laws are heavily loathed against men that not only violate their basic fundamental rights and human rights, but also go all the way to inflict terror onto them legally.

 

 
Since Ages Males are unter-menschen (Sub-Human) PDF Print E-mail
( 4 Votes )

Since ages, men are treated by societies as sub-humans. The societies evolved in such a way that men had to lead painful and emotionless lives. Due to extreme difficulties in a harsh ennvironment, men had to take the entire burden of struggle against nature so that humanity could survive. Since the hunter-gather and tribal societies, the men have to suppress their pain, their sufferings and brave against all odds to fight against nature so that they can protect and feed women, children and old people.

As a result even today, men are considered emotionless creatures. It is widely assumed across all societies that men do not feel emotional pain. Men are supposed to be strong and fearless. Expressing fear, weakness or failures by any man automatically leads to harsh social condemnation by society or even other men. Yet, it is men who took most of the important social decisions. One such decision is, men have no right to cry or express their weaknesses or fears.

So, when a man feels weak and vulnerable, even his most trusted friends will condemn him, judge him and desert him. Society is in complete denial of pain, sufferings and vulnerabilities of men. Suicides of men do not make to front pages of newspapers, as if these are weak men, who deserved to die, so that they do not demoralise other men in the hunting expedition.

While 3 times more men compared to women die due to accidents, suicides or murders in India; for the entire society and Indian state this is a non-issue. Because, males are disposable gender since ages.This huge rate of male deaths, diseases and injuries are not just enough, today the state policies are geared towards formulation of policies on a regular basis to institutionalise further discrimination against men. The policy makers choose to overlook the facts and ground realities because it is a socially accepted fact that males have to be treated as sub-humans and men will take any amount of discrimination and pain as they keep sacrificing for society like some emotionless robots.

The violence existing in male-world is often considered as a terrible crime by men without even an ounce of understanding about how society and family system forces men to crime by denying opportunities and then subjecting them to extremely harsh environments. Criminals are not born, they are carved by the society. Many people justify the large number of deaths of men claiming that men deserved such deaths, because men are inherently evil (sic). 

Hating males and creating social policies to discriminate males, is considered as progressive step towards a better world. Denial of already non-existence voice to abused, harassed, disposable males is  considered an important state policy. It is men who hate men and it is men who perpetuate social policies to discriminate themselves; just the way men on the decks of Titanic did, when the ship sank.

Men are conditioned to be happy at their own emotional castration and they are made to feel proud of their own disposability towards serving the society. The mothers, fathers, teachers and society teaches them to bring glory to their society by sacrificing their own lives. A man is not considered man enough unless he is ready to sacrifice and die for the society and women and children.

There will never be a crime free society unless male disposability ends and unless males are given a voice to express themselves (by fellow men in powerful positions).

It is 1% males who have all the power in the world and remaining 99% male must not falsely assume that they have all the power and opportunities in the world. A male has got a life worse than a donkey, because a donkey can at least shed a few tears and a man can not.

 
Action for 158 in a day, inaction for 158 daily! PDF Print E-mail
( 9 Votes )
It is really unfortunate that the airplane crash in Mangalore accidentally killed 158 people in a go and the Government has decided to review all airports.
But if we look at the suicide statistics available with the NCRB, for the years 2007 and 2008 (the latest data available from NCRB) every single day 158 husbands (married men) have committed suicide due to,
1. Unrealistic expectations from  the society
2. No acceptance.
3. Continued harassment and no listening at all.
This is nothing short of a cold blooded murder of men by the society.
It is really surprising as the Govt. is ready to take action for 158 killed in a day and is sleeping over 158 being killed daily since the last 2 years and the trend is growing in continuing.
Are husbands disposable for the society?
Is killing husbands a social service?
Is the pain of a mother/sister less when she loses a son/brother than when she loses a daughter/sister?
Do not men deserve a life of peace and dignity?
 
Marital Laws: Family Breaking or Money-Making Industry? PDF Print E-mail
( 11 Votes )

The above quotation may sound ambiguous and paradoxical to the reader in its initial stage, but a deeper thought into it, contemplation and a thorough study about it might prove the truth of it. The society is totally unaware of the real facts behind the so called “The Protective Wife-Centric Laws”. They have become, “Destructive” laws” for the husband, his family, the Indian society and mankind as a whole.

The statistics given below proves this fact.

  1. 70,000 marital cases per year.
  2. Average alimony of Rs. 20 Lacs.
  3. Rs. 14, 000 crores business shared by the police, the lawyers and the judges.
 
Invitation for Swiss Anti-Feminism Congress on 25th June, 2011 PDF Print E-mail
( 6 Votes )

The Men's Rights Activists of Switzerland are organising the 2nd Anti-Feminism Congress on 25th June, 2011. Last year, many radical feminists of that country threatened protests during this Conference. As men's rights Activists of India, we show our solidarity with this International effort to expose the dangerous mindset of feminist movement.

The website for this Congress is: http://www.antifeminismus.ch/english/

The Facebook group (Kampf dem Feminismus) is: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=info&gid=109449905758726

 

Interessengemeinschaft Antifeminismus (IGAF)
 

 

Lucerne / Zurich, April 18, 2011

Press Release

2nd International Antifeminist Congress, June 25, 2011

The 2nd International Antifeminist Congress takes place on Saturday, June 25, 2011, from 10am to 5pm at a location close to Zurich, Switzerland. Last year’s meeting (on October 23, 2010) was internationally the first meeting of this kind. The meeting was a big success and is to be considered as a historical achievement of the IGAF. The Interest Group Antifeminism (IGAF) is pleased to present you again this year an exciting line-up of international speakers. The selection of speakers covers a wide range of topics and promises to again make for an exciting congress day! 

On popular request, the program of the 2nd International Antifeminist Congress will include the opportunity to participate in open discussion groups. In the evening, after the official program, there will be a social event where all attendees are welcome to socialize and discuss in open groups. There is also the possibility to go and have dinner together.

Read full Press Release here.....(http://www.antifeminismus.ch/english/downloads/press-release-2nd-antifeminist-congress_180411.pdf)


 
What is Feminism? What are Women's Organisations? PDF Print E-mail
( 4 Votes )

The feminism is defined in Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary as "the belief and aim that women should have the same rights and opportunities as men; the struggle to achieve this aim."

However today, the definition of feminism around the world is, "the belief and aim that women ONLY should have all the rights and opportunities; the campaign to eliminate all the rights and opportunities of men and to push men towards sub-human existence."

It is not acceptable to feminists that gender equality can cut both ways.  Recently, Indian Feminist and parliament member Kanimozhi was accused of massive corruption in a scam by India's anti-corruption bureau. She demanded bail in the court saying,"I must be given bail, because I am a woman and a MP".

When Barack Obama visited India for the first time, his wife Michelle Obama said to media,"If there is a fight between Barack and me, then it is Barack who says sorry, because I am a woman."

Recently, British Member of Parliament Dominic Raab termed feminists as "obnoxious bigots" and urged all men to fight to expose these fanatics. Often feminists claim there is no single group of feminists and try their best to defend that they do not hate males. This is a ploy to mislead society and policy makers. The truth is that all feminists hate men in their lives (fathers, boyfriends, husbands, sons) at one point or other in their life without any valid reason.

Feminists focus their discourse on crime against women by men, while carefully ignoring the pain and sufferings that most emotionally suppressed men take to protect women and the society, as they risk their lives even as they live in an animal like existence. These feminists argue for further social degradation of lives of men with the excuse of some rare occasions of crimes against women. The media in the meanwhile amplifies and sensationalises the rare violence against women, while grossly ignoring crime against men and emotional/physical pain of most men. Men face 24 times more crime than women in India.

Most men support feminists with the false belief that equality among genders will lead to a better world. A careful analysis by any man will show that he is brainwashed into believing that ONLY women suffered throughout ages and men need to support discrimination of fellow men for betterment of humanity.Recently, a British Minister openly spoke about how feminist movement has led to unemployment in poor families and contributed to widened rich and poor gap.

How do feminists and women's organisations work?

1) Feminists believe that only women face crime and violence and men never face crime, violence or discrimination. They aim at elimination of all violence against women, while deliberately ignoring violence and sufferings of men. Often they justify violence and sufferings of men as a means to achieve equality in the society. For example, if a woman chases and hits her husband with a baseball bat, you can see feminists cheering it in their media articles.

2) Feminists claim that men have all the power in the society, while women have none. For example, they believe that the poor male Rickshaw pullers, the garbage cleaner, the firefighter and construction workers, the boys working in road side restaurants are all powerful in their lives, where as the fat women sitting in front of TV watching soap operas for hours are powerless women, who desparately need empowerment.

3) Feminist teachers in schools think boys are noisy, restless rowdies, who will be future rapists unless they are not reined in. So, they abuse and discriminate boys in schools. The result is falling grades of boys in school system.

4) Feminist mothers teach their daughters the importance of hating men and of hating their fathers. They force their boys to play with dolls and keep reminding them regularly,"you are just like your father (an asshole in any case)". They also convince their teenage sons that sex in wedding night was always "marital rape" (since ages). If a feminist mother has only sons and no daughters, then it is certain that she will regularly lament to her kid sons, "if  had daughters, they would have understood my pain. You males are cruel and heartless."

5) Feminists campaign and support abortions of unborn children as the most effective contraceptive for women and have popularised usage of ultrasound machines and abortion clinics.For feminists, an unborn child is not human, has no life and hence it can be killed in the womb. Most abortion clinics are run by feminist gynocologists, who believe right to abortion empowers women. In India, as per feminist law, mothers need not take consent of fathers, if they choose to abort the unborn baby.

    Couple of years back, a famous feminist doctor was caught in TV sting showing her willingness to perform abortion of a girl child. This famous feminist had presented Papers in conferences on "female foeticide". This conference was chaired by some top feminists and Govt women's panel officials of India. Feminists are inherently hypocrites.

6) Feminists relentlessly campaign in the media that its women, who suffer more than men inside families or in the society (even when 50% more males commit suicides due to Family Reasons). Feminists  also make false claims in media that more women than men die in accidents, suicides or murders, w hen reality is exactly opposite. This victimhood of women disempowers people to have a girl child and makes them feel that a girl is a burden (with false notion that girls face more crime than boys). The reality is, boys have 24 times more chance to face crime in their life than girls as they grow up. (for genuine statistics refer: ncrb.nic.in).

 

 
The Anti Legal- Terrorism Day in India PDF Print E-mail
( 9 Votes )

The World Anti-Terrorism Day is observed all over the world on the 21st of May. Coincidentally, on the 20th of May 2005 Honorable Supreme Court of India termed misuse of Section as 498A as “Legal Terrorism” in its landmark judgment by Justice Arijit Pasayath.

Hence, in the same context, in India a day should be dedicated as “The Anti Legal- Terrorism Day”. It is the need of the present day as many unconstitutional, gender-biased, one-sided  “wife-centric and “Draconian Laws’ such as Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, Domestic Violence Act, the many Maintenance laws, Child-Custody and Divorce Law  are being randomly “Misused” by “Wives” and “Daughters –in –law” only with the sole intention of harassing the husband and in-laws and extorting a huge amount either as “Alimony or Maintenance” by manipulation of facts and false allegations on the whole family.

 
Drastic Reductions in Marriage Expenses will end Female Foeticide. PDF Print E-mail
( 4 Votes )

There are 300 million Indians who earn less than two dollars a day. Yet, even people in slums spend 1 to 2 lacs rupees on marriages of children.

Parents who have 2 or 3 daughters save whole life neglecting nutrition and medicine for the daughters and the family.

People spend money in marriage to feed 500 guests in stead of spending money for medicines or healthcare for pregnant women. Middle class Parents who have 2 or 3 daughters lose almost half of their retirement savings during their marriages. This is completely unacceptable. The fear of marriage expenses makes many parents decide not to have girl child.

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 4