To this article in which a middle aged man talks about his nice wife and her volcanic ways:

http://desicritics.org/2008/05/08/001906.php

You wrote:
——————–
Her reaction would be violent for some of my innocuous omissions, but she would be calm to my blunders, where I had expected it to be worse.
——————–

Note:I am sorry to write this.)

Can violent reactions (in tone/emotions or in harshness) be justified?

I am an expert on Men’s Issues and am founder of a men’s rights organisation. When emotionally violent behaviour of men towards wife is considered as domestic violence, why men consider it a privilege to tolerate “violent” behaviour of women?

Every second male that I talk to say, I am scared if I go home late, my wife will be angry and shout at me.

Whatever may be the justification or reason, a man or woman have no right to be even “emotionally violent or display anger” to each other because it is domestic violence as defined by the law.

I hear women say,”Mujhe Bahut Ghussa aata hai”.
What the hell that mean? Has the blind beastly anger has overpowered them?

You wrote:
——————–
She continues to be an enigma, for she will never be provoked when I intend, but erupts like a volcano when least expected.
———————

If a man erupts like a volcano towards his wife, will another woman, society or judges leave him? They will consider him a beast and recommend a punishment of 3 years of imprisonment.

It is impolite to question women, especially the middle aged women with children playing the roles of homemakers. However, with changing realities, men have to start questioning every actions of a woman just the way women are questioning every actions of men and getting laws enacted against men.

It is a fact that men are emotionally weaker than women. Not because of their genetic make up, but because the society suppresses their emotions in childhood. The regular “violent emotions” and volcanic eruptions with “no apparent reasons” need to be discussed. Till now, men were told (rather warned) to tolerate all these for better goods in available in family (god knows what) and for the sake of children.

The social norms and expected behaviour are not constant and they change as the society progresses. When a lot of male behaviour has been put under scrutiny, why the hell the “violent female behaviour” or volcanic eruptions be overlooked?

We, the members of Save Indian Family(SIF) are for a “violence and abuse free” family.

Neither male nor female should be erupting like a volcano whatever the reason may be. Anger is a perfectly unwanted emotion, which was useful in cave age.

Going further, one has to consider the impact of this “violent tone or volcanic eruptions” on the children (male or female). The children are generally conditioned (rather brainwashed) to accept the mother’s behaviour.

So, the male child gets conditioned to tolerate the volcanic eruptions and the female child is conditioned to be volcanic towards her husband. If the young husband responds, then he finds himself termed as a criminal.

A lot of discussion has taken place on impact of violent male behaviour on children, where as the “angry, violent behaviour of mothers” is conveniently ignored because anyone questioning it is considered “mean”.

Today, the first thing we advise to young men is to look at the family of the girl they are getting married to. If the mother of the girl has short temper or erupts like a volcano, then he is doomed from day 1, even though the girl may be extremely calm.

The dangerous part of the story is that these middle aged women become volcanic towards their sons-in-law with no apparent reason. The poor guys just do not understand what has just hit them. They have got not just the violent wife, but also a volcanic mother-in-law as a bonus.

Save Indian Family (SIF) members who got into false dowry cases, can easily relate to angry, violent behaviour of middle-aged women.

They know very well what happens, when they finally stood firm against the volcanic eruptions of mother-in-law.
————————

Finally, 55000 married men committed suicide in year 2006 compared to some 29000 women. The days for tolerance for whatever reason are over. Its time for men to take the battle to the enemy’s territory as there is simply no middle ground with radical feminists having taken over the Government and United Nations.